Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Technologies Information and Communication

Technology use in the conservative family context
Adriana José de Oliveira 1 *
More Detail
1 CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
* Corresponding Author
Full Text (PDF)
Research Article

Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 2020 - Volume 1 Issue 1, pp. 49-59

Published Online: 16 Jun 2020

Views: 168 | Downloads: 732

Open Access
How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Oliveira, 2020)
Reference: Oliveira, A. J. D. (2020). Technology use in the conservative family context. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 1(1), 49-59.
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Oliveira AJD. Technology use in the conservative family context. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication. 2020;1(1):49-59.
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Oliveira AJD. Technology use in the conservative family context. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication. 2020;1(1), 49-59.
Chicago
In-text citation: (Oliveira, 2020)
Reference: Oliveira, Adriana José de. "Technology use in the conservative family context". Journal of Technologies Information and Communication 2020 1 no. 1 (2020): 49-59.
Harvard
In-text citation: (Oliveira, 2020)
Reference: Oliveira, A. J. D. (2020). Technology use in the conservative family context. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 1(1), pp. 49-59.
MLA
In-text citation: (Oliveira, 2020)
Reference: Oliveira, Adriana José de "Technology use in the conservative family context". Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, pp. 49-59.
ABSTRACT
The use of technology was imposed in the professional context and, also, in the social and family environment. The number of technological devices increased significantly in the lives of the individuals, it came to occupy prominent places in the physical space of the family environment and the exposure time to technology never been so high. This increase has brought ethical and moral concerns to families who do not want technology to take a place in their family lives. In this article, the focus is on the relationship between technology exposure and large conservative families. A questionnaire and interviews were conducted with a group of large catholic families to study their exposure to technology and the role of religion in this exposure.
KEYWORDS
Technology exposure Technology localization Conservative family
REFERENCES
  • ABOIM, S. 2005a. As orientações normativas da conjugalidade. Famílias em Portugal-Percursos, Interacções, Redes Sociais, 169-230.
  • ABOIM, S. 2005b. Dinâmicas de interacção e tipos de conjugalidade. Famílias em Portugal. Percursos, Interacções, Relações Sociais, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, 231-302.
  • AMARO, F. 2014. Sociologia da família, Lisboa, Pactor.
  • BELL, J. 1997. Como realizar um projecto de investigação. Gradiva.
  • DIAS, M. O. 2011. Um olhar sobre a família na perspetiva sistémica no processo de comunicação no sistema familiar. Gestão e desenvolvimento, 19, 139-156.
  • DRYSDALE, C. V., ELLIS, H., ROBINSON, W. J. & GROTJAHN, A. 1984. Small or large families: Birth control from the moral, racial and eugenic standpoint.
  • DURKHEIM, E. 1975. Textes, fonctions sociales et institutions, Paris, Minuit.
  • FAHEY, T., KEILTHY, P. & POLEK, E. 2012. Family relationships and family well-being: A study of the families of nine year-olds in Ireland. Dublin: University College Dublin and the Family Support Agency, 1-108.
  • GOODY, J. 1995, 139. Família e casamento na Europa, Oeiras, Celta.
  • HALL, E. T. 1990. The hidden dimension, United States of America, Anchor.
  • HUTCHINS, H. R. 2013. Cheaper by the dozen: communication in large families.
  • INE. 2017. Portal do Instituto Nacional de Estatística [Online]. Available: www.ine.pt [Accessed 10 fevereiro 2018].
  • INE. 2018. Portal do Instituto Nacional de Estatística [Online]. Lisboa Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Available: www.ine.pt [Accessed 12 dezembro 2018].
  • KNOWLTON, C. 1832. Fruits of philosophy. San Francisco: The Reader’s Library.
  • LEE, S. J. 2009. Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509-531.
  • LENHART, A., RAINIE, L. & LEWIS, O. 2001. Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. 1-46.
  • LIVINGSTONE, S. 2002. Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment, Sage.
  • LIVINGSTONE, S., HADDON, L., GÖRZIG, A. & ÓLAFSSON, K. 2011. EU kids online II: final report 2011.
  • MESCH, G. S. 2006. Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6, 119-138.
  • MONTEIRO, T. L. & POLICARPO, V. 2011. Media e entretenimento. In: MATTOSO, J. (ed.) História da vida privada em Portugal. Maia: . Maia: Temas e debates
  • MORGAN, D. 1996. Family connections: An introduction to family studies, Polity Press Cambridge.
  • NIE, N. H., SIMPSER, A., STEPANIKOVA, I. & ZHENG, L. 2004. The ten years after the birth of the Internet, how do Americans use the Internet in their daily lives? Stanford Center for the Quantitative Study of Society, 2-20.
  • OSSWALD, H. 2015. Em torno da história da família. In: FERNANDES, O. M. & MAIA, C. (eds.) A família portuguesa no século XXI. Lisboa: Parsifal.
  • PARSONS 1971. A estrutura social da família. In: ASHEN, R. (ed.) A família: Sua função e destino Lisboa: Edições Meridiano.
  • PONTE, C. 2011a. Acessos e literacias digitais: resultados portugueses do inquérito europeu EU Kids Online. Literacia, Media e Cidadania, 23-38.
  • PONTE, C. 2011b. Uma geração digital? A influência familiar na experiência mediática de adolescentes. Sociologia, problemas e práticas, 31-50.
  • PONTE, C. & BATISTA, S. 2019. EU Kids Online Portugal. Usos, competências, riscos e mediações da internet reportados por crianças e jovens. EU KidsOnline e NOVA FCSH.
  • PONTE, C., JORGE, A., SIMÕES, J. A. & CARDOSO, D. 2012. Crianças e internet em Portugal, Coimbra, Minerva.
  • QUIVY, R. & CAMPENHOUDT, L. 2008. Manual de investigação em ciências sociais. , Lisboa, Gradiva.
  • ROBERTS, D. F. 2000. Media and youth: Access, exposure, and privatization. Journal of adolescent health, 27, 8-14.
  • ROE, K. 2000. Adolescents’ media use: a European view. Journal of adolescent health, 27, 15-21.
  • ROGERS, E. C. & NIKKEL, S. R. 1979. The housing satisfaction of large urban families. Housing and Society, 6, 73-87.
  • SARACENO, C. & NALDINI, M. 2003. Sociologia da família, Lisboa, Estampa.
  • SEGRIN, C. & FLORA, J. 2011. Family communication, Routledge.
  • SIMIONATO, M. A. W. & OLIVEIRA, R. G. 2003. Funções e transformações da família ao longo da história. Anais do I Encontro Paranaense de Psicopedagogia, 57.
  • TOFFLER, A. 1984 A terceira vaga, Lisboa, Livros do Brasil.VAN DIJK, T. A. (ed.) 2000. Cognitive discourse analysis, Barcelona University of Amsterdam.
  • VAN DIJK, T. A. 2006. Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse studies, 8, 159-177.
  • VAN DIJK, T. A., MEDEIROS, B. W. L. & ANDRADE, M. L. C. 2013. Análise crítica do discurso multidisciplinar: um apelo em favor da diversidade. Linha D’Água, 26, 351-381.
  • WALL, K. 2005. Famílias em Portugal, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
  • WALL, K. & GUERREIRO, M. D. 2005. A divisão familiar do trabalho. In: WALL, K. (ed.) Famílias em Portugal Lisboa: Imprensa das Ciências Sociais.
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All Rights Reserved © 2020-2024