Journal of Technologies Information and Communication

Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems
Vítor Gonçalves 1 * , Carlos Cardoso 2, André Almeida 2
More Detail
1 CIEB, Polytechnic Institute ofe Bragança, Portugal
2 ESTiG, Polytechnic Institute ofe Bragança, Portugal
* Corresponding Author
Research Article

Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 2021 - Volume 2 Issue 1, pp. 45-58
https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371

Published Online: 13 Apr 2021

Views: 161 | Downloads: 75

How to cite this article
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Gonçalves et al., 2021)
Reference: Gonçalves, V., Cardoso, C., & Almeida, A. (2021). Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 2(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gonçalves V, Cardoso C, Almeida A. Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication. 2021;2(1):45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Gonçalves V, Cardoso C, Almeida A. Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication. 2021;2(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
Chicago
In-text citation: (Gonçalves et al., 2021)
Reference: Gonçalves, Vítor, Carlos Cardoso, and André Almeida. "Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems". Journal of Technologies Information and Communication 2021 2 no. 1 (2021): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
Harvard
In-text citation: (Gonçalves et al., 2021)
Reference: Gonçalves, V., Cardoso, C., and Almeida, A. (2021). Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems. Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 2(1), pp. 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
MLA
In-text citation: (Gonçalves et al., 2021)
Reference: Gonçalves, Vítor et al. "Comparison Study between Scientific Conference Management Systems". Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021, pp. 45-58. https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.371
ABSTRACT
Currently, there are thousands of conferences and each one has its own characteristics. This work is part of a real challenge proposed by a structure of a Polytechnic Institute of Portugal, to a team of students, who during a semester, carrying out teamwork, developed technical and transversal knowledge and skills necessary for the execution of a work plan. In this paper, a challenge will be presented, which consisted of comparing management systems for scientific conferences. The result of the comparative analysis of three main free online platforms will be presented, through a comparison matrix based on several parameters that were measured on a Likert scale at the level of criteria such as usability, accessibility, and functionality. The results seem to point to the EasyChair system, except if it is a small local conference with less than 30 submissions.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
  • [1] P. Martins, “Back officepara plataformas web de Gestão de Conferências Científicas: Desenvolvimento e Avaliação”, 2013.
  • [2] L. Miguel and R. Oliveira, “Plataforma Colaborativa Para Organização e Gestão de Conferências”, 2014.
  • [3] S. Dias, A. Bessa, A. A. Baptista, and N. Garcia,“ScienceDirect Web Platforms for Conference Management”, no. October, 2014, doi: 10.13140/2.1.3859.9049.
  • [4] L. Parra, S. Sendra, S. Ficarelli, and J. Lloret, “Comparison of Online Platforms for the Review Process of Conference Papers”, CONTENT 2013 FifthInt. Conf. Creat. Content Technol., no. c, pp. 16–22, 2013.
  • [5] Even3, “Quem somos”, Even3.com.br. https://www.even3.com.br/empresa/quem-somos/ (accessed 30/04/2020)
  • [6] Fachin, Odília. “Fundamentos de metodologia”. São Paulo: saraiva. 2001.
  • [7] M. Balestro, E. Vargas, and E. Junior, “Estratégias Comparativas em Estudos de Caso em Administração”. Outubro, Recife/PE, 2007.
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.